ABSTRACT

This book argues that the standard arguments for and against the claim that certain Hindu texts and traditions attribute direct moral standing to animals and plants are unconvincing. It presents careful, extensive, and original interpretations of passages from the Manusmrti (law), the Mahābhārata (literature), and the Yogasūtra (philosophy), and argues that these texts attribute direct moral standing to animals and plants for at least three reasons: they are sentient, they are alive, and they possess a range of other relevant attributes and abilities.

This book is of interest to scholars of Hinduism and the environment, religion and the environment, Hindu and/or Buddhist philosophy more broadly, and environmental ethics.

chapter |2 pages

Introduction

chapter 1|17 pages

A plausible environmental ethic

chapter 2|21 pages

Instrumentalist interpretations 1

chapter 3|20 pages

Interconnectedness interpretations

chapter 4|16 pages

Sameness interpretations

chapter 6|18 pages

The moral standing of animals and plants in the Mahābhārata

Part I: The burning of the Khāṇḍava Forest

chapter 7|19 pages

The moral standing of animals and plants in the Mahābhārata

Part II: The dialogue on vegetarianism and ahiṃsā in the Anuśāsanaparvan

chapter |12 pages

Conclusion