Evaluating anti-poverty programs, [electronic resource]

By: Material type: TextTextSeries: Policy Research Working Paper, no. 3625Publication details: Washington, D.C. World Bank 2005Description: 74 pSubject(s): DDC classification:
  • 301.441
Summary: "0The author critically reviews the methods available for the ex-post counter factual analysis of programs that are assigned exclusively to individuals, households, or locations. The discussion covers both experimental and non-experimental methods (including propensity-score matching, discontinuity designs, double and triple differences, and instrumental variables). Two main lessons emerge. First, despite the claims of advocates, no single method dominates; rigorous, policy-relevant evaluations should be open-minded about methodology. Second, future efforts to draw more useful lessons from evaluations will call for more policy-relevant measures and deeper explanations of measured impacts than are possible from the classic (""black box"") assessment of mean impact. ""--World Bank web site."
List(s) this item appears in: World Bank Working Paper Series
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Item location Shelving location Call number Status Date due Barcode
Books Vikram Sarabhai Library Rack 9-B / Slot 299 (0 Floor, West Wing) General Stacks 301.441 R2E9 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Available 162178

Includes bibliographical references.

"0The author critically reviews the methods available for the ex-post counter factual analysis of programs that are assigned exclusively to individuals, households, or locations. The discussion covers both experimental and non-experimental methods (including propensity-score matching, discontinuity designs, double and triple differences, and instrumental variables). Two main lessons emerge. First, despite the claims of advocates, no single method dominates; rigorous, policy-relevant evaluations should be open-minded about methodology. Second, future efforts to draw more useful lessons from evaluations will call for more policy-relevant measures and deeper explanations of measured impacts than are possible from the classic (""black box"") assessment of mean impact. ""--World Bank web site."

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.