Essays on strategic interactions in vertical supply chains: on the role of inventory and technology

By: Material type: TextTextPublication details: Ahmedabad Indian Institute of Management 2023Description: 112p.; ill. Includes tables and bibliographiesSubject(s): DDC classification:
  • TH 2023-10
Summary: The past two decades have witnessed a shift from centrally managed supply chains to decentralized supply chains (Netessine, 2004). In decentralized supply chains, interests of individual members may not be aligned with each other. This dissertation is an attempt to understand how the interactions among various agents in a decentralized supply chain are impacted by different supply chain characteristics. Specifically, we explore the role of inventory and technology on manufacturer-retailer interactions in decentralized supply chains. This dissertation consists of three essays, which focus on the following supply chain characteristics: (i) the manufacturer’s cost learning (ii) the retailer’s adoption of tracking technology, and (iii) mass customization facilitated by using 3D printing. In the first essay, we study how the manufacturer’s cost learning impacts the retailer’s inventory decisions in a decentralized supply chain. Cost learning refers to the manufacturer’s ability to reduce the marginal production cost due to learning from production activities. We highlight the ubiquity of cost learning across various industries and discuss how the manufacturer’s cost learning interacts with the retailer’s strategic inventory. Anand, Anupindi, and Bassok (2008) have demonstrated that retailers have an incentive to carry inventory strategically as a bargaining chip to induce the upstream manufacturer to drop future wholesale prices. The manufacturer, anticipating the retailer’s strategic behavior, responds by increasing the early period wholesale price. However, when the manufacturer experiences cost learning, whereby the future production cost reduces with the cumulative production in the early period, she also has some incentive to reduce the early period wholesale price to induce the retailer to purchase more. Hence, in the presence of cost learning, the manufacturer faces a dilemma: should she hold inventory, bearing her holding cost, to progress faster on the learning curve, or should she adjust her wholesale price to encourage the retailer to carry inventory, who bears his holding cost but also uses it as a bargaining chip to lower future wholesale prices? We formulate a game-theoretic model to address this dilemma and characterize the optimal inventory holding pattern in the supply chain.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Shelving location Call number Status Date due Barcode
Thesis (FPM) Vikram Sarabhai Library Non-fiction Reference TH 2023-10 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for Issue (Restricted Access) CD002709

Thesis Advisory Committee
Prof. Sachin Jayaswal (Chair Person)
Prof. Ankur Sinha (Member)
Prof. Benny Mantin (Member)

The past two decades have witnessed a shift from centrally managed supply chains to
decentralized supply chains (Netessine, 2004). In decentralized supply chains, interests of
individual members may not be aligned with each other. This dissertation is an attempt
to understand how the interactions among various agents in a decentralized supply chain
are impacted by different supply chain characteristics. Specifically, we explore the role
of inventory and technology on manufacturer-retailer interactions in decentralized supply
chains. This dissertation consists of three essays, which focus on the following supply chain
characteristics: (i) the manufacturer’s cost learning (ii) the retailer’s adoption of tracking
technology, and (iii) mass customization facilitated by using 3D printing.
In the first essay, we study how the manufacturer’s cost learning impacts the retailer’s
inventory decisions in a decentralized supply chain. Cost learning refers to the manufacturer’s
ability to reduce the marginal production cost due to learning from production activities.
We highlight the ubiquity of cost learning across various industries and discuss how
the manufacturer’s cost learning interacts with the retailer’s strategic inventory. Anand,
Anupindi, and Bassok (2008) have demonstrated that retailers have an incentive to carry
inventory strategically as a bargaining chip to induce the upstream manufacturer to drop
future wholesale prices. The manufacturer, anticipating the retailer’s strategic behavior,
responds by increasing the early period wholesale price. However, when the manufacturer
experiences cost learning, whereby the future production cost reduces with the cumulative
production in the early period, she also has some incentive to reduce the early period
wholesale price to induce the retailer to purchase more. Hence, in the presence of cost learning,
the manufacturer faces a dilemma: should she hold inventory, bearing her holding cost, to
progress faster on the learning curve, or should she adjust her wholesale price to encourage
the retailer to carry inventory, who bears his holding cost but also uses it as a bargaining chip to
lower future wholesale prices? We formulate a game-theoretic model to address this dilemma
and characterize the optimal inventory holding pattern in the supply chain.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.