International commercial arbitration: a transnational perspective

Table of Content:

Preface to the sixth edition V table of cases Xxix
Chapter I. Introduction 1
American Almond Products Co. v. Consolidated Pecan Sales Co., Inc.
I.1.c. Arbitration and Litigation 8
Arbitration from a User’s Point of View (Siemens’ Dispute Resolution
I.1.d. Expert Determination, Adjudication and Contract Adaptation
International Chamber of Commerce, Rules for the Administration of Expert 17
I.1.e. Mediation, Conciliation and Multi-tier Clauses 29
Conciliation Rules of the International Arbitral Center of the Federal Economic Chamber Vienna—Appendix 5 to the Rules of Arbitration
I.1.f. Institutional and Ad Hoc Arbitration 48
I.1.g. Fast-Track Arbitration 57
Stockholm Rules for Expedited Arbitrations 58
I.2. On the Evolution of the Standing of Arbitration Within the Legal System
I.2.a. Note 63
I.2.b. Historical Developments in Selected Jurisdictions. I.3. The Sources of Relevant Norms and Possible Conflicts 83
I.3.a. Note—The Sources 83
I.3.b. Conflicts Between Various Sources 91
I.3.b.i. Party Stipulation Versus Institutional Rules ................ 92
Award of the Court of Arbitration at the Hungarian Chamber of Commerce and
II.1.a.vii.Issues Pertaining to the Range and Limits of the Arbitration Agreement
II.1.b. The Arbitration Agreement—Forms and Content128
HKL Group Co.Ltd v. Rizq International Holdings Pte Ltd 143
II.1.e. Compelling the Reluctant Party to Arbitrate: An Overview on the Ways of Enforcing an Arbitration Agreement ...................... 160
PepsiCo Inc. v. Oficina Central De Asesoria Y Ayuda Tecnica, C.A.
Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant JSC (Appellant) v. AES Ust-Kamenogorsk
II.1.e.iii.Waiver of the Right to Compel Arbitration .................. 172
Menorah Insurance Co., Ltd. v. INX Reinsurance Corp.
Texaco Overseas Petroleum Co. & California Asiatic Oil Co. v. The Government of
II.1.f.ii. Negative Effect of Kompetenz-Kompetenz Provided for in the Arbitration Law: The French Example ........ 190
American Bureau of Shipping v. Jules Verne et al. ..... 190
II.1.f.iii.Negative Effect of Kompetenz-Kompetenz: Jurisdictions Without Clear Statutory Guidance ........ 193
Nigel Peter Albon v. Naza Motor Trading Sdn Bhd & Ors (No 3)
II.1.f.iv.Negative Effect of Kompetenz-Kompetenz in U.S. Law
First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan, et Ux. and MK Investments, Inc.
II.1.f.v. Separability Revisited and the Void Ab Initio Doctrine
Sojuznefteexport (SNE) (USSR) v. Joc Oil, Ltd. (Bermuda)
Harbour Assurance Co. (UK), Ltd. v. Kansa General International Assurance Co.,

This documents supplement contains the latest versions of arbitration’s primary sources, including the New York Convention, the UNCITRAL Rules and 2006 Model Law, national arbitration statutes, leading institutional rules, and Codes of Conduct for arbitrators. It contains important recent changes in these sources, such as the new 2014 AAA International (ICDR) Rules, the new 2014 LCIA Rules, the new 2015 CIETAC Rules, the new 2014 IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest, the new 2013 IBA Guidelines on Party Representation, and the new 2015 ICC Expert Rules.

http://www.westacademic.com/Professors/ThomsonWest/default.aspx?tab=4