Triangle effect and the connotative meaning of trust in prisoner's dilemma by Sasi Misra and Amar Kalro (Working Paper, No. 1978/257)

By: Material type: TextTextPublication details: Ahmedabad Indian Institute of Management 1978 Description: 19 pSubject(s): DDC classification:
  • WP 1978 (257)
Summary: Two hundred and forty nine male postgraduate students of management played the prisoner's dilemma game (Deutsch, 1960) and filled out a post game questionnaire measuring attitude toward the "other player". Striking differences resulted between trusting and trustworthy subjects on the one hand and suspicious and untrustworthy subjects on the other with respect to different meanings given to the dimension of trust (cooperation) in the interaction. As predicted, trusting behaviour of the other player was given a positively evaluative meaning-good versus bad-by the trusting and trustworthy subjects and negatively dynamism meaning weak versus strong - by the suspicious and untrustworthy subjects. The trusting players expected the typical other to make either trusting or suspicious moves, whereas the suspicious subjects expected the typical other to be uniformly suspicious, yielding a high Triangularity Index (Kelley and Stahelski, 1970). Most provocatively, while 51% of trusting subjects thought that the other player was a female, 81% from among the suspicious subjects though so. Some implications of the results in interpersonal and Organizational situations are discussed.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Status Date due Barcode
Working Paper Vikram Sarabhai Library WP 1978 (257) (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Available WP000257

Two hundred and forty nine male postgraduate students of management played the prisoner's dilemma game (Deutsch, 1960) and filled out a post game questionnaire measuring attitude toward the "other player". Striking differences resulted between trusting and trustworthy subjects on the one hand and suspicious and untrustworthy subjects on the other with respect to different meanings given to the dimension of trust (cooperation) in the interaction. As predicted, trusting behaviour of the other player was given a positively evaluative meaning-good versus bad-by the trusting and trustworthy subjects and negatively dynamism meaning weak versus strong - by the suspicious and untrustworthy subjects. The trusting players expected the typical other to make either trusting or suspicious moves, whereas the suspicious subjects expected the typical other to be uniformly suspicious, yielding a high Triangularity Index (Kelley and Stahelski, 1970). Most provocatively, while 51% of trusting subjects thought that the other player was a female, 81% from among the suspicious subjects though so. Some implications of the results in interpersonal and Organizational situations are discussed.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.